又名: 美国六零年代廉租房运动的破产
导演: Chad Freidrichs
类型: 纪录片
制片国家/地区: 美国
片长: 79分钟 IMDb: tt1788461 豆瓣评分:8.7 下载地址:迅雷下载
人口流失,租户收入下降,maintenance投入无以为继。于是从充满希望与温暖灯光的社区,在二十年间沦落到暴力滋长的城市最暗角落。
背景是战后rise of suburb,是white flight加剧的segregation,是st.louis这座城市失去人口增长和经济发展——这些远比Charles Jencks之流的“现代主义建筑”标靶更重要。但在片中受访者的口述里,背景是她/他的童年,是一生中第一个美好的圣诞夜,或目击手足中弹死去后第一段经年的梦魇…种种种种,属于人的情感和记忆,似乎又更重于一切关于税基的探讨。
他们对punitive rules的体验,所受strong stigmatization的困扰,触目惊心。看这部纪录片前我读过同名的论文,侧重辨析“现代建筑之死”是怎么被步步塑造和得到有力传播的,其中不乏精彩的论说。但只有寥寥两行说起,曾住在其中的人究竟怎么看待它。我那天提出了这个困惑:
“But what remains an important question to me is, what the residents said about their dwelling in this notorious public housing. This article was written carefully, double-checking many facts and details in the discourses and texts, but failed to give a specific source when it mentioned 'they were pleased'. It is one of the most cited articles on Pruitt-Igoe. I found another one with more details also stated that the residents 'functioned reasonably well in the early years of occupancy'.
所以Maria推荐我看看这部纪录片。原来他们有这样多的话想要说;是我想要听。
Housing只是复杂难解社会问题中的一环,Pruitt Igoe的失落,完全说明了它无法独立地成为解决方案。但它又同时是state power作用在individual/private life上最重要的着力点,为它筹谋、用它图谋的政客、官僚、技术人员、社区组织们,何其任重而道远。
结尾处失去亲人的前租客说了一段让我印象深刻的话:
“Would I have been a nicer person [if I had never been in that environment]?
“I am envious of people that have grown up in less trying environments.
“… so it has taught me empathy.”
做一些更善良的事,去回应个体生命中的时间与空间。
用那天讨论时写的总结作这篇短评的结尾吧,“… it can be a reminder against 'depoliticising', integrating with the post-modern circumstances discussed widely in philosophy of architecture and many other fields.”